Can Hindus be militents?

Note:
The views expressed here are my own.
If any person or group feels that they are derrogatory/defamitory in any way, can contact me by email at
blogeditor123@gmail.com
I shall apologise on this blog if there points are worth noticing.
Sincerely,
The Editor

Recently, Indian media has been uttering rubbish about Hindus involved in bombings at several Muslim places.
It was sad that those bombings took place, but is it right to blame Hindus for that?
If Muslim militents or pretending to be true muslims atack the Hindu temples, does it mean that Hindus will do the same?
Hindus can be theives, robbers, goons, Maoists, but they can never ever be militents!
And, those who become Maoists, they follow the communist ideology, hence they have no religion!
If Hindus would have been Militents, then no non-Hindu would have been living in peace and harmony in India!
The Hindu who has worshiped Cow as mother, can never think of bloodshed!
If Hindus would have been militents, then
1. They would have highjacked a plane for the release of Sadhvi Pragya singh and other inocent Hindus.
2. They would have never let any non-Hindu become the president of India.
3. They would have never let any church or mosque built.
4. they would have burnt those alive who slotter cow, lute the temples, atacked the Ashram of H.H Asaramji bapu and who planned to kill Swami Ramdev.

Note:
Some points have been taken from
http://www.hindujagruti.org

Regards,
The editor.